Monday, June 11, 2012

VAWA - Title II - The Entire MISSING Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children

Courtesy American Mothers Political Party

childrensrightsstoptheabuse

Please Contact Your Legislatures; And Send To Them A Copy of the Deleted VAWA - Title 2 - Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children; and The Passed Resolution 2466 that supports the intent of  Protecting Women and Children in the deleted Section.

I had posted this 'exact' title and  information in a 'note' on facebook Friday. By Sunday night - the Abusers lobby had the 'Note' - removed for "Abusiveness". I kid you not,screenshot here. I just did a search within face book as the note was shared all over the place and the entire FB site has been scrubbed, literally. Only external links outside of FB and those links are not making it into the FB servers.

Contact Information and download links:

Packet to Send to Legislatures:

###

Question:

What happened to the entire section of the VAWA addressing PAS (essentially identifying use of PAS legal strategies as violence against women which endangers children)?

Answer:

THAT is the question that NOBODY is willing to answer, not even the Administration which includes the main person who originally introduced VAWA. Read the resolution I posted, that is what prompted me to get Fairfax, CA to enact Resoluton 2466.

I seem to have been the first person in the country, that is other than the legislators who introduced VAWA, American Psychological Association Task Force members (Yes, the APAORIGINALLY did condemn PAS) and Father Rights Lobby (Why do you think they are so against the VAWA -- it would have sent all of these psychos and f^*^s to prison), to have identified this. But, all of the so-called advocates were so busy furthering their own agendas -- and lining their own pockets.
(Answered by Cindy Ross - a special thanks)

###

Fairfax Praised and Commended For Efforts Toward Ensuring That Domestic And Child Abuse Cases Are Adjudicated Properly and Applauds The Historic Step Taken by the Fairfax Town Council toward Eliminating The Systematic Abuse of Women and Children.

On Dec. 6, the Fairfax Town Council passed a resolution calling for revision of California family code and the federal Violence Against Women Act, and resolving that the Town Council joins the National Organization for Women in denouncing the use of the "parental alienation syndrome" legal strategy.
Parental alienation syndrome, originally crafted as a legal defense of child molesters, is routinely used in family court to mishandle domestic and child abuse cases as custody disputes and to punish mothers and children reporting abuse.

Use of parental alienation syndrome underlies not only egregious child custody rulings - especially custody switches to batterers and child molesters - and family court related misconduct, but the misuse of government programs and funding. In 2003, the American Prosecutors Research Institute identified parental alienation syndrome as the means to obstruct prosecution of abuse cases.
On behalf of the National Alliance for Family Court Justice, I would like to thank Councilman Lew Tremaine for sponsoring and the entire Fairfax Town Council for voting to adopt Resolution 2466. Our group, joined by supporters from California NOW, California Protective Parents Association and court reform activists and concerned citizens from Marin and across the country, commends the effort toward ensuring that domestic and child abuse cases are adjudicated properly and applauds the historic step taken by the Fairfax Town Council toward eliminating the systematic abuse of women and children.

More:

See a compilation of these and more like them in a collection here:  VAWA, Parental Alienation Syndrome, Fathers Rights

VAWA Title II Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children

The Entire Deleted Section here. LIMITING THE EFFECTS OF VIOLENCE ON CHILDREN 

Abusers, Abusers Rights, Democrats, Endangers Children, Fatherhood, HHS, Joe Biden Legal Violence Against Women, Missing Section, Obama, PA, PACA, PAD, Parental Alienation Syndrome, PAS, Pedophiles, Republicans, Title Two, VAWA, Shared Parenting, Family Rights,Pedophile,

VAWA - Title II - The Entire MISSING Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children

Courtesy American Mothers Political Party

childrensrightsstoptheabuse

Please Contact Your Legislatures; And Send To Them A Copy of the Deleted VAWA - Title 2 - Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children; and The Passed Resolution 2466 that supports the intent of  Protecting Women and Children in the deleted Section.

I had posted this 'exact' title and  information in a 'note' on facebook Friday. By Sunday night - the Abusers lobby had the 'Note' - removed for "Abusiveness". I kid you not,screenshot here. I just did a search within face book as the note was shared all over the place and the entire FB site has been scrubbed, literally. Only external links outside of FB and those links are not making it into the FB servers.

Contact Information and download links:

Packet to Send to Legislatures:

###

Question:

What happened to the entire section of the VAWA addressing PAS (essentially identifying use of PAS legal strategies as violence against women which endangers children)?

Answer:

THAT is the question that NOBODY is willing to answer, not even the Administration which includes the main person who originally introduced VAWA. Read the resolution I posted, that is what prompted me to get Fairfax, CA to enact Resoluton 2466.

I seem to have been the first person in the country, that is other than the legislators who introduced VAWA, American Psychological Association Task Force members (Yes, the APAORIGINALLY did condemn PAS) and Father Rights Lobby (Why do you think they are so against the VAWA -- it would have sent all of these psychos and f^*^s to prison), to have identified this. But, all of the so-called advocates were so busy furthering their own agendas -- and lining their own pockets.
(Answered by Cindy Ross - a special thanks)

###

Fairfax Praised and Commended For Efforts Toward Ensuring That Domestic And Child Abuse Cases Are Adjudicated Properly and Applauds The Historic Step Taken by the Fairfax Town Council toward Eliminating The Systematic Abuse of Women and Children.

On Dec. 6, the Fairfax Town Council passed a resolution calling for revision of California family code and the federal Violence Against Women Act, and resolving that the Town Council joins the National Organization for Women in denouncing the use of the "parental alienation syndrome" legal strategy.
Parental alienation syndrome, originally crafted as a legal defense of child molesters, is routinely used in family court to mishandle domestic and child abuse cases as custody disputes and to punish mothers and children reporting abuse.

Use of parental alienation syndrome underlies not only egregious child custody rulings - especially custody switches to batterers and child molesters - and family court related misconduct, but the misuse of government programs and funding. In 2003, the American Prosecutors Research Institute identified parental alienation syndrome as the means to obstruct prosecution of abuse cases.
On behalf of the National Alliance for Family Court Justice, I would like to thank Councilman Lew Tremaine for sponsoring and the entire Fairfax Town Council for voting to adopt Resolution 2466. Our group, joined by supporters from California NOW, California Protective Parents Association and court reform activists and concerned citizens from Marin and across the country, commends the effort toward ensuring that domestic and child abuse cases are adjudicated properly and applauds the historic step taken by the Fairfax Town Council toward eliminating the systematic abuse of women and children.

More:

See a compilation of these and more like them in a collection here:  VAWA, Parental Alienation Syndrome, Fathers Rights

VAWA Title II Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children

The Entire Deleted Section here. LIMITING THE EFFECTS OF VIOLENCE ON CHILDREN 

Abusers, Abusers Rights, Democrats, Endangers Children, Fatherhood, HHS, Joe Biden Legal Violence Against Women, Missing Section, Obama, PA, PACA, PAD, Parental Alienation Syndrome, PAS, Pedophiles, Republicans, Title Two, VAWA, Shared Parenting, Family Rights,Pedophile,

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

REINSTATE The Entire DELETED Section of VAWA - Title 2 - Identifying The Use of ‘PAS Legal Strategies’ as Violence Against Women Which Endangers Children

Everyone -- Please send it to your legislators along with a copy of Resolution 2466, asking them to help reinsert this back into the VAWA. If we can get that done, use of PAS to harm women and children will be a federal crime, and we will be able to work on cutting off the funding once and for all. And once there's no money flowing to the court whores, they're not going to keep doing what they're doing.

Copy of Resolution 2466 : http://www.nafcj.net/fairfax.htm

Deleted VAWA - Title Two: http://j.mp/L8U12g

It's NOT just the Republicans who have stalled and reformed language in the VAWA (2012). But an entire section was DELETED (VAWA 1997).  http://j.mp/L8U12g

 

The current Administrations original creator of the Bill of (VAWA 1994). Now, VP Joe Biden and President Obama have completely ignored, are denying and hiding what is obvious to any one who has any sense, any brain cells at all?

Seriously WTF?

VAWA - Title 2 - The entire MISSING section of the VAWA identifying use of PAS legal strategies as violence against women which endangers children. Parental Alienation Syndrome, PA, PAS, PACA, PAD

This is the 1997 ENTIRE SECTION that was REMOVED from VAWA on behalf of the FATHER RIGHTS/Abuser Rights Lobby.

Question:

What happened to the entire section of the VAWA addressing PAS (essentially identifying use of PAS legal strategies as violence against women which endangers children).

Answer:

THAT is the question that NOBODY is willing to answer, not even the Administration which includes the main person who originally introduced VAWA.
If you read the resolution I posted, that is what prompted me to get Fairfax, CA to enact Resolution 2466. http://www.nafcj.net/fairfax.htm

The crazy thing is that *I*, yes little old ME from a dinky little town, not a legislator, not a lawyer, and doing this entirely with my own time at my own expense, seem to have been the first person in the country (!!!), that is other than the legislators who introduced VAWA, American Psychological Association Task Force members (Yes, the APA ORIGINALLY did condemn PAS) and FRsters (Why do you think they are so against the VAWA -- it would have sent all of these psychos and f**kers to prison), to have identified this. But, all of the so-called advocates were so busy furthering their own agendas -- and lining their own pockets.


Special Thanks to Cindy Ross
http://www.nafcj.net/f...
and NOW
http://www.now.org/iss...=%22VAWA%20section%20201% 20parental%20alienation%2 2

Fairfax praised for efforts
On Dec. 6, the Fairfax Town Council passed a resolution calling for revision of California family code and the federal Violence Against Women Act, and resolving that the Town Council joins the National Organization for Women in denouncing the use of the "parental alienation syndrome" legal strategy.

Parental alienation syndrome, originally crafted as a legal defense of child molesters, is routinely used in family court to mishandle domestic and child abuse cases as custody disputes and to punish mothers and children reporting abuse.

Use of parental alienation syndrome underlies not only egregious child custody rulings - especially custody switches to batterers and child molesters - and family court related misconduct, but the misuse of government programs and funding. In 2003, the American Prosecutors Research Institute identified parental alienation syndrome as the means to obstruct prosecution of abuse cases.

On behalf of the National Alliance for Family Court Justice, I would like to thank Councilman Lew Tremaine for sponsoring and the entire Fairfax Town Council for voting to adopt Resolution 2466. Our group, joined by supporters from California NOW, California Protective Parents Association and court reform activists and concerned citizens from Marin and across the country, commends the effort toward ensuring that domestic and child abuse cases are adjudicated properly and applauds the historic step taken by the Fairfax Town Council toward eliminating the systematic abuse of women and children.

To view the text of Resolution 2466, click on the Town Manager's Blog

Cindy Ross, California director, National Alliance for Family Court Justice, Fairfax

VAWA - Title 2 - The Entire MISSING Section of the VAWA Identifying Use of PAS Legal Strategies as Violence...