Pages

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Kansas Watch Dog: "Claudine Dombrowski: An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts"

 

Compelling stories from parents and grandparents about problems with placement and removal of children

By Earl Glynn On December 4, 2009

See this video: Claudine Dombrowski Abused Mom Wants Unsupervised Visits with Daughter

Listen to Claudine Dombrowski Testimony to Joint Committee on Children's Issues:

 

Claudine Dombrowski

Claudine Dombrowski:  An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts

 

Claudine Dombrowski: An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts

Read details in written statement.

This is an truly incredible story that should never have happened in America.

Parts of the Kansas Judicial system should be disciplined for how it has victimized Ms. Dombrowski, who was an abused mom.

Instead of quotes from the audio, please consult these pages that document Dombrowski’s long and difficult battle to protect her daughter:

As you view these photos keep in mind that the court awarded FULL CUSTODY of their daughter to the “man” who did this to Claudine.

State Rep Bill Otto: “No crime? You haven’t been guilty of anything? This is a court order that says you can’t go to any school functions?”

“I was under court order till 2004 to not even call the police after I was being beaten because … I was not ‘co-parenting’”

Dombrowski: “These friends of the court make recommendations to the judge. The parents … don’t have a right to see these documents. They do this behind closed doors.”

Otto: (To Secretary Jordan): “You have no rights as a parent …?”

Secretary Don Jordan: “This would be something extreme … I’m not familiar with the situation.”

Otto: “Can a judge do that? … Is that legal… ?”

Jordan: “Under the right circumstances … I hesitate to speculate.”

Sen. Roger Reitz: “This is something that only … the judicial system can really answer … It would be helpful … to have someone … representing the judicial system … to give us some ideas how this could happen.”

Dombrowski: “When you are a victim of domestic violence, and suddenly there’s a child involved, the typical …. power of control is that ‘I’ll take your children from you’. They will and they can the way the laws are setup.” …

“I was told that I’m not to talk to my daughter about the violence. That’s why I don’t see her. That’s why I see her supervised. He was criminally convicted. “

“When women try to get away from people who hurt them … I heard somebody say it’s really hard to believe you won’t call the police … I tell people not to contact the police, because as soon as you walk into court with a DV (domestic violence) and children, you’re already cutting your throat. You will lose your children. That’s the way it is right now.”

“… on the 16th of this month I’ll probably go to jail for breaking the gag order and talking about [being the victim of] violence as it relates to my case.”

Reitz: “… someone ought to be able to deal with this in a way that would address her problem. It doesn’t seem like we’ve done the right thing with regards to this little niche of the law.”

Dombrowski: “The criminal convictions are completely tossed aside and they don’t have any bearing on the family court … The eight criminal convictions that my ex had before getting custody of my daughter were completely dropped [in family court]“

Chair Kiegerl: “I cannot believe that abuse is totally ignored. I cannot believe you can prohibit a person from speaking about their own case.”

“The one thing [where] … I disagree with you is abuse should always be reported.”

State Rep Peggy Mast (R-Emporia): “Domestic violence is a control issue. Sexual abuse is a control issue. Is there any correlation between domestic violence and sexual abuse? Why is that not something that is considered when we take someone to [family] court that has a history of domestic violence?”

Dombrowski: “Yes. That is something I’ve asked myself for 16 years. … It comes back to the family court that has a veil of immunity. … They don’t fully understand the impact of the violence. What battered women have … if they report the abuse, then they’re failing to protect their child … if they don’t report the abuse, they’re still failing to protect their child. So, both ways, they’re going to lose their children …”

For anybody who abuses their wife … [from] a 1996 presidential task force … there is a 70% increase that those children will be abused and/or sexually abused after there’s been battery with the mother.

Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudea: “In 2004 …. I talked with the homicide department in Sedgwick County…. During that time there had been 21 homicides in Sedgwick County and 18 were due to domestic violence …”

“A lot of women do make those phone calls and unfortunately, sometimes it ends in their death.” …

“I want to apologize to you for being treated like a pedophile … not being able to go to a music concert.”

“I commend you for what you’re doing.”

Dombrowski: “I have not talked to my daughter in 10 years [except] for the confines of supervised visits. I’m not allowed to talk to her about anything. All she knows is what her dad has told her.”

See this video:  Abused Mom Wants Unsupervised Visits with Daughter

Listen to Claudine Dombrowski:

http://kansaswatchdog.podbean.com/2009/12/04/claudine-dombrowski-an-abused-mom-victimized-again-by-the-kansas-courts/

Therapy With Your Abuser?

Source: The New Randi James Therapy With Your Abuser?

Parental alienation cases are dealing with accusations of physical/sexual violence in the family. Upon divorce, the truth about the abuse is revealed to the court, and is refuted through claims of parental alienation. It is very similar to child sex abuse claims and the legal strategy of false memory syndrome.

According to most state laws, claims of domestic violence must be taken seriously. However, in light of the fact that major children and family organizations have been trained and infiltrated by the fathers' rights groups, the allegations (and real evidence) are ignored.

Abuse can be determine substantiated, unsubstantiated, or false. Very often the case is rendered unsubstantiated--which does NOT mean NOT true.

The question is, is therapy WITH your [alleged] abuser humane? Parental alienation theorists believe so.

Labels: child sexual abuse, CPS, DHHS, ethical violations, parental alienation fraud,psychological fraud

 

    The abuser will try to manipulate the therapist, and try to gain sympathy. He may try to control the appointments, and be unreasonable as possible...and if you don't adhere to his demands, it will be portrayed as your fault or your unwillingness to participate.

    In session, the abuser may try to trigger you, threaten you or outright lie. The threats may not be obvious to the therapist, he could make innuendos or refer to past events. Or use the children to send messages to you, to intimidate you or simply manipulate the children to his bidding.

    Common tactics for an abuser: make the victim appear to be mentally unstable, uncooperative or that she is the one causing the abuse.

    There is no way real therapy can be conducted in this environment. You have to watch everything you say and do. Hide your emotions. Appear not to be afraid or anxious or upset. Even coming to a session with documentation or a witness may work against you. And in truth, no competent therapist would ask a victim to be in session with an abuser, especially without alot of individual therapy and a safety plan put in place ahead of time.

      Questions for Richard Warshak and His Parental Alienation Syndrome...or Divorce Poison...or Whatever --money making Scam thingy

      Questions for Richard Warshak and His Parental Alienation Syndrome...or Divorce Poison...or Whatever

      Dear Dr. Warshak,
      Dr. Amy J. Baker's research confirmed that "parental alienation" occurs in intact families--that is, families that have not been through a divorce or separation. I am sure this must have been found in other literature as well.
      My question is, if parental alienation is a mental health diagnosis serious enough to warrant inclusion in the DSM V, how do you propose to treat it when the parents are still "together"? Will they get family counseling through your Bridges program? Who will be responsible for paying for it? What if the alienator doesn't cooperate? What if the child doesn't cooperate?
      Or, is this not parental alienation (it definitely isn't "Divorce Poision," is it?)?

      Monday, December 6, 2010

      ***COURT WHORE OF THE WEEK*** Judge David Debenham Topeka, Kansas

      http://www.courtwhores.com/

      COURT WHORES

      Court Officials and their Accomplices who sell out

      **Innocent  Children**

      to ABUSERS and MOLESTERS


      for

      PROFIT and POWER

      ========================

      The Blood of Countless Children is on the hands of these Court Whores
      ______________________

      *This website is Dedicated to all the Children harmed by Court Whores*

      Together we will Change the System to protect Children, not Abusers!!


      ***COURT WHORE OF THE WEEK***


      Judge David Debenham
      Topeka, Kansas
      For more info:
      http://www.angelfury.org/
      ______________________

      Kansas -- Domestic violence is on the rise—again- YEAR 2010--

      Kansas -- Domestic violence is on the rise

      "A KBI report issued this fall indicates 23,864 domestic violence incidents were reported to law enforcement in 2009, up 11 percent from 2008 and the highest number since the bureau began releasing the statistic in 1992." http://cjonline.com/news/local/2010-12-05/domestic_violence_on_the_rise

      Just a little message for Rikki Dombrowski in Topeka, Kansas USA- because this Sunday, December 12th is her birthday.

      Just a little message for Rikki in Topeka, Kansas USA- because this Sunday December 12th is her birthday.
      "All your family in Belgium wish you a Happy Birthday!!!"
      "We send to you all our love and we hope to see you a day.
      Lots of loves and kissesses. We Love you Rikki!"


      Your Family;
      -The Dombrowski's -- Belgium
      (Aunt Sabrina, Uncle Frederic, Nieces, Nephews, Cousin's, Grandfather, his wife)

      ******Note:
      Please spread this video--- although she is held captive, the www will get to her and she will know how loved she is-- that she is not forgotten and that her family loves her so very much.
      Especially her mother Claudine Dombrowski who on December 12, 1994 became a mother-- and knew what unconditional love was truly about.
      Six years later she was stolen by the family courts--given to her Mothers abuser Hal Richardson and has been kept away from her mother for now 11 years.

      http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org/pag...
      "You can not chain the wind-- no matter how hard you try."  Fly high-- Fly Free.

      All over the Nation their is a CRISIS in the Family Courts—Abusers get Custody

      *******

      Rikki, Granny, Mom ,apos;Dont give up apos; Love power ... - Google Video - Motore di ricerca video Truveo

      Child Custody PSA - End Court Ordered Child Abuse

      Battered Mothers Custody Conference Interviews
      Category:

      News & Politics

      Tags:

      Wednesday, August 18, 2010

      Don Hoffman M. Jill Dykes GAL File multiple last minute Motions to continue- So that their ‘hand picked Judge Judge Joe Johnson will dismiss Contempt's against PERP- Judge Joe Johnson Takes over the Shawnee County Case from Hell on September 1, 2010—the current Judge David Debenham will likely follow the Law – and Justice may be served—THE MUST STOP THE HEARING set for August 20th 2010

      Hal Richardson directly has violated the courts Orders for mother daughter contact. The list has grown to 67 Direct Violations since the filing of the July 6 Motion- 3x each week for Custodial Parental interference.
      The New Judge (Joe Johnson) that will be hearing the case after this Judge (David Debenham) moves to criminal will dismiss the contempt's and allow daddy and GAL and other whores of the court to continue the abuse.
      ‘They’ are afraid that the current judge (David Debenham)  will actually follow the law as he has done in the previous orders since January this year.
      01-29-2010 Court Hearing Transcript here
      01-29-2010 Court Order for parenting Time
      07-06-2010 Affidavit of Accusation In Contempt
      Hearing set for August 20 2010
      THEN; these following motions at the midnight hour after Hearing has been set for over 3 months decide hearing MUST BE CONTINUED.
      08-18-20210 GAL M. Jill Dykes Motion to Continue
      Respondent atty Called objecting- Judge dismissed  But:
      08-18-2010 Don Hoffman Atty for Abuser Hal Richardson Files Motion to continue.
      These court whores and ‘perp’ protectors DO NOT WANT THIS JUDGE TO HEAR THE CONTEMPTS OR the Parental Interference.
      They know that Judge Joe Johnson who will have this case September 1 2010 will dismiss it all—as he is ‘owned’ and his rulings on this case in the past (for three years Judge Johnson did everything that the court appointed child abusers wanted)